If you are obsessing as
I am now about the
appropriateness of
contacting them please
read:
However this is not the
most important point
here. Apparently the
enable e-mail address
was incorrect. In the
reply they gave me a
link to more information
and a different e-mail
address to send your
enquiry.
There are serious and
detrimental consequences
to the NHS reform about
which we do not know.
These risks need to be
made public.
E Petition launched
calling for the NHS Risk
Register to be
published.
Andrew Lansley is
blocking the publication
of the NHS Risk Register
by appealing the
Information
Commissioner's order
that the Register be
published. He is doing
so because it contains
grave warnings about the
risks posed by his
Health & Social Care
Bill. I promise you that
the content of that
Register warns about the
potential surge in costs
associated with the NHS.
The Register details a
lack of experience in
commissioning as well as
a diminution in buying
power caused by the
decentralisation and
dismantling of the old
structure. The Risk
Registers warn about a
Post Code lottery
affecting certain
regions as they lose out
in the new 'slice up' of
funding arrangements.
Most gravely, the
Register warns about the
profit element of the
private provision
'driving up' costs as
they siphon off profits
from the NHS.
Continue reading more
and sign the petition
either on the Green
Benches Blog
http://eoin-clarke.blogspot.com/2012/02/e-petition-launched-calling-for-nhs.html
or here:
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/27426
Please be sure to read
the entire entry as it
contains some important
information.
I have just finished
e-mailing all the house
of Lords peers with the
exception of the
conservatives. I may
write to them at some
time as it should not be
assumed that they are
all in agreement with
these reforms and cannot
be persuaded otherwise,
particularly as they
become aware of public
opinion. In fact I very
much doubt that all of
the conservative
party, MPs and peers,
are in agreement with
the NHS reforms any more
than I believe that the
welfare reforms were
agreed upon unanimously
by the consensus of
every Tory MP.
What a shocking state of
affairs, what a disgrace
this government is. Not
only have they made life
extremely difficult,
insecure and fearful for
many of us who are sick
and disabled and
otherwise disadvantaged
by unemployment and low
wages, by their unfair
welfare reforms, they
are now hell bent on
making life worse by
destroying the NHS.
Alright for this
government of
millionaires and high
wage earners who no
doubt will be able to
afford insurance and
private health care.
What kind of warped
mentality is driving
these people to take
such destructive
measures against those
who are sick and
disabled, and do not
forget anyone at any
time can become ill and
unable to work and
dependent of the state.
February 16th
More action you can take
to prevent the
privatisation of the NHS
Rally to
Save Our
NHS
7 March,
18.00-19.30.
Central
Hall,
Westminster
and
streamed
LIVE
online
Those
who work
in the
NHS and
those
who use
it are
telling
the
government
they
must
think
again
about
their
controversial
Health
and
Social
Care
Bill.
The
Bill is
still in
the
House of
Lords
and this
is our
best
chance
to
change the
proposals
before
it
returns
to the
Commons,
where
the
government
can rely
on party
whips to
get it
passed.
Continue
reading
and
register
for
either
the
rally or
to take
part in
a
virtual
(on-line)
rally
http://www.goingtowork.org.uk/rally-to-save-our-nhs/
Please
Sign
Pat's
Petition
Please sign the on-line
petition to
"Stop
and review the cuts to
benefits and services which
are falling
disproportionately on
disabled people, their
carers and families."
This is a government petition which if the number of signatures reaches a 100,000 the government will debate the e-petition in the house of commons and review the matter, right now the signatures stand at only 30,000.
We need to get that target of 100,000 signatures s
o Please Please sign if you have not done so. Also please pass on to others by the usual social network routes.
You may also be interested in signing a similar petition created by Bob Reitemeier Chief Executive, The Children's Society, which has only about 7,000 signatures:
Don't let disabled children pay the price for welfare reform: reverse unfair plans to cut support by up to £27 per week for 100,000 disabled children
This
is the
greatest
time in
history
in which
we can
really
make a
difference
even if
we are
too sick
or
disabled
even to
leave
the
house.
The
internet
has
allowed
many of
us to
have our
say.
Though
of
course
many do
not have
access.
Sadly
millions
do not
even
have
enough
food or
clean
water.
Things
can and
must
change
and we
should
try even
if it is
only to
sign a
petition
to make
our
voices
heard so
that in
the
future
we can
have a
fair and
just
society
were no
person
goes
hungry,
no one
is
exploited
and the
resources
are used
for the
benefit
of all
at the
expense
of no
one nor
any
other
creature
or the
environment.
We have
to bring
about an
end to
the
voracious
greed of
the one
percent
and make
our
world a
decent
place to
live.
Every
journey
so the
old
Chinese
proverb
says
begins
with a
single
step.
Please
take at
least
one step
and
participate
in one
of the
actions
above or
elsewhere
on the
website.
Thank
you
February
18th
I had to
remove
yesterdays
entry.
It was
just a
confused
mess,
riddled
with
errors.
I did it
in a
rush, at
least it
felt
like
that
though
it took
at least
three
hours. I
am
sitting
here
wondering
whether
to re
post it
as I
spent
more
time in
the
afternoon
trying
to get
it
right.
If you
did not
see the
entry
you of
course
have no
idea
what I
am
referring
to.
Yesterday
morning
I was
beside
myself
with
anger
because
of the
news
that the
government
are
about to
force
sick and
disabled
people
into one
of their
unpaid
workfare
"work
experience"
programmes.
The
shocking
injustice
of this,
the
crowning
atrocity
against
people
who are
struggling
with
serious
medical
conditions
and
disabilities
filled
me with
such
rage
that I
had to
write
something.
It takes
me a
long
time to
really
present
a piece
of
writing
though
lately
entries
have
appeared
most
days.
They are
not
perfect
by any
means,
none of
my
writings
ever
are, but
yesterday
was
really
such a
mess.
Sadly
OCD
doubts
are
immerging
and more
and more
i
question
everything
I write.
Along
with
increasing
exhaustion
this is
taking
its
toll.
Below is
the
revised
entry
Of all
the
hideous
Tory
outrages
against
the most
vulnerable
and
disadvantaged
in our
society,
the
latest
prospect
of the
sick and
disabled
being
forced
into
unlimited
unpaid
work or
face
cuts to
their
benefits
of up to
three
months
has to
be the
most
disgusting
inhumane
and
bloody
evil
aspect
of the
government's
agenda
of
forced
labour,
in other
words
slavery.
It is
bad
enough
that
abled
bodied
young
people
are
being
coerced
into
work
experience
programs
for no
remuneration
other
than
their
Job
seekers
allowance.
A thirty
hour
week no
less,
sometimes
on a
nightshift
as is
the case
concerning
a recent
Tesco
advert .
The so
called
job was
advertised
on the
Jobcentre
Plus
website
and
offered
only
expenses
and
Jobseekers'
Allowance
for
permanent
night
shift
work at
a store
in East
Anglia.
Later
after
being
inundated
with
comments
via
social
media
Tesco
said it
was an
IT
mistake.
However
at first
Tesco
had
stated
that the
job was
part of
a
government-backed
scheme
that
guaranteed
a job
interview
at the
end of
the
placement.
As if
that
justified
this
form of
exploitation.
Floods
of irate
postings
appeared
on the
store’s
Facebook
page and
the
topic
trended
on
Twitter.
Read the
full
story
http://www.channel4.com/news/ad-for-job-with-no-pay-a-mistake-says-tesco
Ya
sure, a
mistake.
As my
mother
used to
say "I
believe
you but
thousands
wouldn't"
Well no
I don’t
believe
them of
course.
Whether
advertised
or not
this
happens,
young
people
are
working
for
thirty
hours
each
week for
their
Job
Seekers
Allowance
about
£67 only
£53 for
under
eighteens.
This
works
out at a
fraction
over £ 2
and £
1.70 per
hour
respectively.
Shame
on
Tesco.
Boycott
the
store.
Send
back
your
points
cards
and
coupons
as I
intend
to do
and tell
them
what you
think of
their
participation
in these
so
called
Work
Experience
programmes.
More on
Tesco:
Tescos
accidentally
reveals
the
exploitation
at the
heart of
workfare
There has been
huge outcry
in response to
a job advert from Tescos for a 30 hours a week nightshift UNPAID through the Job Centre Work Experience scheme. This isn’t a one-off. A year ago, Boycott Workfare spoke to someone at the job centre who had just finished seven nights on the trot of forced unpaid work at Tescos.Please Continue reading this is a very informative article
http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=404
Such
programmes
are
nothing
short of
coercion
Yes
coercion
is not
too
strong a
word if
your
benefits
are
withdrawn
if you
do not
comply.
In fact
slavery
is not
an
inappropriate
description
under
such
circumstances.
Yes in
theory
you can
refuse
but in
reality
this is
extremely
difficult
if you
face
loosing
your
only
source
of
income.
Now
the
government
want to
enforce
a
similar
practice
on sick
and
disabled
people
who
are
claiming
Employment
and
Support
Allowance
ESA who
have
been
assigned
to the
Work
Related
Activity
group
The
idea of
sick and
disabled
people
participating
in these
grossly
unethical
forced
labour
schemes
is
surely
the
lowest
the
government
have
sunk
with
their
vicious
and
uncompromising
employment
agendas.
Not
even the
terminally
ill are
spared
Did
you Know
that not
even the
terminally
ill will
be
spared.
Yes
anyone
on ESA
who has
more
than six
months
to live
will
also be
expected
to
participate
in the
governments
forced
labour
schemes.
For
goodness
sake!!!!!!!
Surely
we can
allow a
dying
person
to make
the most
of
whatever
time
remains
to them
without
forcing
them to
work for
the
piffling
benefit
upon
which
they
will by
no fault
of their
own
depend.
Have the
government
no
humanity,
on
feelings,
no
compassion,
no sense
of
decency,
no
ethical
code of
conduct.
Seemingly
not!.
I bet
if you
were
sucked
in by
the Tory
rhetoric
and
voted
for them
or the
Lib/Dem
you now
regret
it.
This
morning
I came
across
the
following
statements
that
Cameron
said
before
the
election,
which in
light of
recent
events
seem now
so
utterly
shocking
in their
insincerity.
Referring
to his
disabled
son he
said
“I
help
care for
a
severely
disabled
child –
my son.
It’s
what I
do at
the
start of
each
day.
It’s
sharpened
my focus
on the
world of
care
assessments,
eligibility
criteria,
disability
living
allowance,
respite
breaks,”
Later,
in
another
interview,
yet
again he
explains
how his
own
personal
experiences
had
shaped
his
views:
The very
painful
thing
about
disability
–
whether
your own
or your
loved
one’s –
is the
feeling
that the
situation
is out
of your
control.
When the
system
that
surrounds
you is
very
top-down,
bureaucratic,
inhuman,
that can
only
increase
your
feelings
of
helplessness
… but I
do
believe
there
are
moments
of
despair,
helplessness
and
frustration
that
could be
directly
alleviated
by the
work of
government.
You
have to
ask
yourself
if what
you are
reading
are the
words
once
uttered
by this
man who
along
with
Greyling,
Osborne
and
Freud
has
mercilessly
ran
roughshod
through
the
entire
welfare
system -
which
was
already
no match
for the
more
generous
benefit
systems
in the
rest of
Europe
and also
more
difficult
to
qualify
for -
reducing
the
income
of every
single
disabled
person
including
children
and
leaving
young
people
who are
born
disabled
dependent
on a
parent
or
partner.
Also
implementing
a flawed
assessment
that
declares
disabled
and sick
people
as fit
to work
when
they are
not able
to do
so, with
the
result
of many
people
committing
suicide.
His
gross
reforms
will
find the
streets
filled
with
homeless
people
as the
changes
to
housing
benefit
force
people
out of
their
homes as
they are
plunged
into
poverty.
The list
goes on
and on
and I
have
wrote
extensively
here
about
these
atrocities
I
wonder
what his
policies
concerning
disability
would
have
been if
his son
had not
been
disabled.
His
focus
was
sharpened
alright,
targeted
to
destroying
the
lives of
the sick
and
disabled,
not in
the
direction
one
would
expect
from the
above
sentiments.
It’s
bad
enough
that the
government
have
seriously
destroyed
the
lives of
chronically
sick and
disabled
people
including
children
as a
result
of their
unfair
draconian
welfare
reforms,
without
now
resorting
to force
sick and
disabled
people
into
unpaid
work.
This
loathsome
government
are
nothing
more
than
greedy
callous
self
serving
cowards
who
follow
the
grossly
inhumane
politics
of a
leader
whose
own
sanity
surely
must be
questioned.
The
manipulative
rhetoric
of this
man who
used his
own
disabled
son to
win
disabled
voters
confidence
that he
had
their
best
interests
at heart
is so
typical
of the
manipulative
ways of
a
sociopath,
what
other
explanation
can
there
be. He
is
either a
sociopath
or he is
evil,
either
way he
is not
suitable
for his
position
as Prime
minister
and it
is high
time
that
some of
the more
moderate
conservatives
used
their
influence
and find
someone
more
suitable.
A motion
of no
confidence
perhaps.
I cannot
in all
honesty
believe
that
every
Tory MP
is in
total
agreement
with
this
callous
man who
along
with
Greyling,
Osborne
and
Freud,
have
targeted
the most
vulnerable
in
society
with
their
hideous
agendas
Here
are some
comments
about
this
latest
outrage
quoted
in the
Guardian
Newspaper.
Neil
Bateman
of the
http://www.nawra.org.uk/
said:
"Compulsory,
unpaid
work may
worsen
some
people's
health,
with the
consequences
of the
DWP's
savings
being
passed
on to
the NHS
at
greater
cost.
"If
jobs are
there to
be done,
people
should
get the
rate for
the job,
instead
of being
part of
a
growing,
publicly
funded,
unpaid
workforce
which,
apart
from
being
immoral,
actually
destroys
paid
jobs."
Neil
Coyle,
director
of
policy
and
campaigns
at
http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/,
said:
The
idea
that
disabled
people
should
work but
receive
no
financial
recognition
for
contributing
is
perhaps
a level
of abuse
in and
of
itself.
More
information
please
read the
Guardian
article
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/feb/16/disabled-unpaid-work-benefit-cuts?fb=native&CMP=FBCNETTXT9038
No
one,
disabled
or
otherwise
should
be made
to do
unpaid
work
under
any
circumstances
! These
work
schemes
are not
a path
way to
work,
merely
exploitative
slave
labour
which
will be
keenly
accepted
by all
the
usual
unscrupulous
money
grabbing
unethical
retailers
such as
Tesco,
Asada
and
Holland
and
Barrett,
to name
just a
few of
the
retailers
who will
be all
be only
too
willing
to have
another
section
of our
vulnerable
society
to
exploit.
It is
time
that
charities
spoke
out
against
these
programmes
and stop
beating
about
the bush
and
condemn
these
schemes
for the
injustices
that
they are
The
governments
so
called
work
experience
schemes
contravene
both the
Universal
declaration
of human
rights
and the
UK’s own
human
rights
laws.
In
the case
of young
people
and
forced
labour.
Young
people
are
working
for as
much as
30 hours
a week
of
unpaid
labour
and have
to be
available
from 9am
to 10pm.
The
same
could
well
apply to
disabled
people
as there
is no
limitation
of
Duration.
But even
if it is
only a
few
hours
for a
few
weeks it
is still
forced
labour.
Forced
because
it is
under
threat
of
loosing
benefits
for non
compliance.
The
sick and
disabled
need to
focus on
coping
with
their
conditions
and
sometimes
that is
about
all they
can do
and
indeed
all they
should
be
expected
to do.
There
is no
question
in my
mind. No
disabled
or
chronically
sick
people
should
be
forced
to work
for no
wages on
penalty
of
loosing
their
benefits.
No one
should
be
forced
to work
under
such
duress.
What
with one
thing
and
another
the laid
back
attitude
of some
of the
prominent
charities
throughout
this
crisis
has had
a
serious
impact
on the
ease
with
which
this
bill
progressed
through
the
house of
commons.
Most of
the more
rigorous
campaigning
was
undertaken
by sick
and
disabled
people
themselves.
I have
done
nothing
much
except
blog and
write
endless
letters
to MPs
and the
house of
Lords
members
for
weeks
about
welfare
reforms
and more
recently
regarding
the
privatisation
of the
NHS as
have
many
others
in
desperate
attempts
to turn
the tide
of these
unfair
reforms.
Had
more
vigorous
and more
meaningful
campaigns
been
launched
to drop
the
entire
bill by
all of
the main
charities,
would we
find
ourselves
in the
position
we are
today,
on the
brink of
the most
drastic
and
viscous
wellfare
reforms
ever
passing
into
law.
Labour
enforced
by the
threat
of
withholding
benefits
surely
constitutes
a breach
of the
Declaration
of Human
Rights
Article
4.
Universal
Declaration
of Human
rights
No
one
shall be
held in
slavery
or
servitude;
slavery
and the
slave
trade
shall be
prohibited
in all
their
forms.
This
scheme
also
violates
the UK’s
Human
Rights
Act 1998
Article
4
“Prohibition
of
slavery
and
forced
labour.
2) No
one
shall be
required
to
perform
forced
or
compulsory
labour.”
The
Human
Rights
Act 1998
is an
Act of
Parliament
of the
United
Kingdom
which
received
Royal
Assent
on 9
November
1998,
and
mostly
came
into
force on
2
October
2000.
Its aim
is to
"give
further
effect"
in UK
law to
the
rights
contained
in the
European
Convention
on Human
Rights.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1
Also
in a
more
general
way the
whole
welfare
reform
bill
must
surely
contravene
Article
25
•(1)
Everyone
has the
right to
a
standard
of
living
adequate
for the
health
and
well-being
of
himself
and of
his
family,
including
food,
clothing,
housing
and
medical
care and
necessary
social
services,
and the
right to
security
in the
event of
unemployment,
sickness,
disability,
widowhood,
old age
or other
lack of
livelihood
in
circumstances
beyond
his
control.
•(2)
Motherhood
and
childhood
are
entitled
to
special
care and
assistance.
All
children,
whether
born in
or out
of
wedlock,
shall
enjoy
the same
social
protection.
These
and
other
forced
labour
programmes
contravenes
Article
4 and
other
articles
of the
Universal
Declaration
of Human
Rights
such as
Article
23.
(1)
Everyone
has
the
right
to
work,
to
free
choice
of
employment,
(2)
Everyone,
without
any
discrimination,
has
the
right
to
equal
pay
for
equal
work.
Hardly
equal
pay
for
equal
work
is
it,
nor
is
it a
free
choice
of
employment.
These
work
programs
are
compulsory,
no
choice,
no
equal
pay,
just
your
benefit
ESA
or
JSA.
If
you are
outraged
write to
your MP
http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/
More
Action
you can
take
Please visit Boycott
Workfare and get
involved:
Boycott Workfare is a UK-wide campaign to end forced unpaid work for people who receive welfare. Workfare profits the rich by providing free labour, whilst threatening the poor by taking away welfare rights if people refuse to work without a living wage. We expose and take action against companies and organisations profiting from workfare; encourage organisations to pledge to boycott it; and actively inform people of their rights.
http://www.boycottworkfare.org/
Please
sign
this
e-petition
Petition
to
Abolish
Work for
your
Benefit/Workfare
Schemes
in the
UK
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/29356
Take
part in
Consultations
There
are a
couple
of
consultations
at the
moment
regarding
aspects
of
welfare
reform
both
inviting
comments
which
you may
wish to
respond
to.
There
may be
others
and if I
come
across
them I
will
include
them
here.
This is
a chance
to say
what you
think.
Work
Capability
Assessment:
accounting
for the
effects
of
cancer
treatment
–
informal
consultation
This consultation seeks to gather evidence and views about proposed improvements to the way the Work Capability Assessment assesses individuals who are suffering from cancer.
The Department is keen to obtain the views of all interested stakeholders, including individuals who have been or are being affected by cancer, their families and carers, healthcare practitioners and cancer specialists as well as representative organisations and employers
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/consultations/2011/wca-assessment.shtml
Closing
date: 9
March
2012
In my opinion and that of most everyone else no one with cancer should
be in
the work
capability
groups.
Patients
suffering
with
cancer
or any
potentially
terminal
illness
should
automatically
be
granted
benefits
without
the need
for
assessment.
None
should
be
forced
to work
under
any
circumstance.
Personal Independence Payment: assessment thresholds and consultation
This consultation is intended to seek views on the second draft of the assessment criteria for Personal Independence Payment and in particular on the changes that have been made since the first draft, the proposed descriptor weightings and entitlement thresholds and the draft regulations. At this stage in the development process we do not envisage making significant changes to the broad principles or scope of the assessment and so are not seeking views on these.
You
can read
more
about
this in
February7th
entry
I am
concerned
about
the
replacement
of DLA
with PIP
, the
most
worrying
aspect
is the
20
percent
cut back
in
funding
which
will
mean
about
500,000
people
who now
get DLA
will not
qualify
for PIP
End date
30 April 2012http://www.dwp.gov.uk/consultations/2012/pip.shtml
Update
I had not noticed something that is just so shocking about the Workfare forced labour schemes that relate to the sick and disabled who are in the ESA Work-Related Activity Group WRAG. Unlike the young people's forced labour time limit of eight weeks, though I understand that in some cases it can be as much as two years, for people on ESA WRAG there is no time limit. In theory you could find yourself having to do unpaid work indefinitely. The length of time it seems is dependent upon the whims of your job centre advisor and the employer.
Though there is a brief mention earlier in this entry about this, this fact really did not sink in until I read the latest posting from the Diary of a Benefit Scrounger:
Eternal
Slavery
for Sick
and
Disabled
Sue
Marsh
Basically if you are sick or disabled and an assessment has found that you may be capable of some work at some point in the future, with the right support, you can now be forced to take part in the Government's "Workfare" scheme, working for free to make more profit for Tesco and Asda and Poundland! Yay! With Lupus or Schizophrenia or Leukaemia or waiting for a kidney transplant or.... well anything really. You're probably exempt with less than 6 months to live, but only if you can be sure it's not a day over 6 months.
Continue reading this satirical post which so well describes the situationhttp://diaryofabenefitscrounger.blogspot.com/2012/02/eternal-slavery-for-sick-and-disabled.html
Here is an excellent
article from the Daily
Mail!!!!!
For once the Daily Mail
are being supportive by
including this the
article:
This is
not wartime Nazi Germany
and Cameron's attacks on
the vulnerable and needy
must be stopped
By Sonia Poulton
'
...over
the past week or so I
have sat back and
watched our Coalition
Government surpass
itself in its campaign
of terror against some
of the most needy in our
society.
There we were
thinking it impossible
that David Cameron's
Tory party could become
even more dastardly,
even more duplicitous,
in their devastating
aims against those in
vulnerable groups -
sick, disabled, single
parent families and the
elderly - but they
have.'
'As a result of
Cameron's spurious
recent behaviour in
pushing through
crippling, quite
literally for some,
amendments to disability
benefits, it has become
clear that the attached
issues are even more
heinous that the
blueprint of the Welfare
Reform Bill, itself.
And it is this: disabled
people will now face the
prospect of unlimited
unpaid work or they will
be subject to cuts in
their benefits. For
millions that is nothing
more than a line on a
page but for many
terrified and suicidal
others, it is anything
but.'
Be sure to read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2102484/This-wartime-Nazi-Germany-Camerons-attacks-vulnerable-needy-stopped.html#ixzz1mk5TMxEc
Many thanks to both Sue
Marsh and
Sonia
Poulton respectively for
excellent and passionate
articles.
Also very grateful for
this clear description
of what is happening
from A Latent Existence
Which if you have not
already read it by
clicking the Link in
Sue's blog above
please do so now:
.latentexistence.me.uk/government-taps-sick-and-disabled-people-as-source-of-free-labour/#comments
Also
.latentexistence.me.uk/government-work-placement-schemes-little-more-than-slave-labour/
and
http://www.latentexistence.me.uk/who-benefits-from-the-work-programme/
Please note this
paragraph from the above
webpage that so well
describes the reality of
the Workforce programme
and the advantages to
employers at the
expensive of unemployed
youth and soon people on
ESA
WRAG
People sent on these
placements are often
doing the same jobs as
people paid a full time
minimum wage, except
that is becoming rarer
because many businesses
that take part in the
scheme have laid of
temporary and part time
staff in favour of free
labour from the scheme.
Instead of paying their
staff, these big
businesses are getting
paid to put people to
work. This might perhaps
be just about acceptable
if the people on the
schemes were given a job
at the end of the
placement, but the norm
is for them to be sent
back to the job centre
and a new unemployed
person put to work in an
endless cycle of free
labour. It is baffling
why our government
thinks that paying
businesses money to
exploit people and
making people work a
full time job to the
benefit of private
industry for just their
£53 per week job seekers
allowance is a good
idea. Even if the DWP do
require people to work
in return for their
benefits (And I don’t
think that fits the
ideal of ensuring that
no one is destitute) I
do not think they should
be required to work for
more hours than they
receive the equivalent
money for at minimum
wage. Indeed, it may
well be illegal for
these people not to be
paid minimum wage and I
hope that there are some
successful legal cases
against the scheme soon.
Be sure to read the
whole article
latentexistence.me.uk/who-benefits-from-the-work-programme/
were you will find
examples of people who
have worked along side
paid employees doing
exactly the same jobs.
I am so outraged by this
turn of events that I
had to include the
above. It is vital that
everyone knows just how
low this morally
bankrupt
government have sunk.
This morning I sent the
letter mentioned earlier
to Tesco returning a
coupon and store points
card cut in four letting
them know I will not set
foot in the store until
they pull out of the
workfare scheme.
Please consider if at
all possible boycotting
as many retailers as you
can who are involved in
the workforce scheme.
February 20th
Today is World Day of
Social Justice.
While we know that
there are many serious
social injustices
throughout the world
this does not mitigate
the devastating effects
on the sick and disabled
and the unemployed here
in the UK with regard to
the government’s vicious
welfare reforms.
Might be a good day to
write to the UN about
this though I still have
not had a response to
the e-mail I sent
recently. Which is
disappointing since I
had a quick response the
first time when I sent
it to the wrong
department who within a
day or two sent me the
correct e-mail address
below.
However it is early days
and perhaps if more
people write they may
take more notice
Committee on the
rights of persons with
disabilities
The Committee on the
Rights of Persons with
Disabilities (CRPD) is
the body of independent
experts which monitors
implementation of the
Convention by the States
Parties.
http://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/crpd/pages/crpdindex.aspx
email: crpd@ohchr.org
The following are
links to information
concerning the UN World
day of Social Justice
which some of you may
find interesting. Though
it is a good thing that
these days highlight
problems worldwide,
sadly nothing ever seems
to change.
http://www.un.org/en/events/socialjusticeday/
http://www.ilo.org/global/meetings-and-events/campaigns/voices-on-social-justice/lang--en/index.htm
There is a segment of
the video that focuses
on disability.
This is a very moving
video. It is a tragedy
in this world of plenty
when so many go without
life enriching
opportunities and indeed
more often than not the
very basics of life such
as food, clean water,
shelter and life saving
medicine while the
minority, the one
percent, have far far
more than they will ever
need.
Don't be overawed by
the thought of writing
to the UN, you have as
much right to express
your views and request
intervention as anyone
else.
February 22nd
Urgent Action for today
I received the following
notification from 30
degrees on Monday I
either did not notice it
or it has only just
appeared in my e-mail
box. So there is only
this morning to take any
action.
The action required is
though simple.
Read through the
information below that I
received from 30 degrees
and sign the form
letter. You can use your
own words for more
impact, it is a simple
one paragraph letter.
However if you can't
cope with this just send
it as it is
This Wednesday,
(today)there's
a crunch NHS vote in
Parliament. MPs
will vote on whether to
demand the publication
of a secret government
report into the risks
facing the NHS.
That could be another
nail in the coffin of
Andrew Lansley's plans -
so let's pile the
pressure on our MPs to
vote the right way.
Right now, Andrew
Lansley is in a tricky
position to defend. He
wants MPs and Lords to
back his plans for the
NHS. But he's
refusing to let them
find out what the risks
are. If we work
together to put our MPs
under pressure, there's
a decent chance they'll
refuse to do Lansley's
dirty work for him.
This vote could
go either way - send
your MP an email asking
them to back publishing
the secret report - it
takes two minutes:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/nhs-risk-report
The vote will take place
on Wednesday afternoon.
That means we've
got just over 48 hours
to convince enough MPs
to vote to publish the
secret report.
The more of us that
email our MPs right now,
the more likely we are
to succeed.
38 Degrees members,
doctors, nurses and
academics have all been
warning for ages that
Lansley's plans put our
health service at risk.
We know there's a secret
report that could prove
that we're right -
so let's work
together to get this
report published
before it's too late.
Write to your MP and
tell them to vote the
right way at the risk
report debate on
Wednesday:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/nhs-risk-report
Thanks for being
involved,
David, Johnny, Hannah,
Marie, Cian, Becky and
the 38 Degrees team
PS. Last week we managed
to get e-petition past
100,000 signatures. Now
there's a crunch vote on
the risk report - so
email your MP:
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/nhs-risk-report
Pass on to as many
people as possible by
social networking:
Twitter, facebook,
forums, websites, e-mail
February 23rd
If liberty and equality,
as is thought by some,
are chiefly to be found
in democracy, they will
be best attained when
all persons alike share
in government to the
utmost.
In a democracy the poor
will have more power
than the rich, because
there are more of them,
and the will of the
majority is supreme.
Democracy is when the
indigent, and not the
men of property, are the
rulers.
Aristotle
Looks like no matter
what the public want, if
it is not in keeping
with the government’s
agenda they will take no
notice.
Is this democracy?
What actual say do you
and I have? Very little
it would seem as yet
again the government run
roughshod over the will
of the people.
The Government has
thwarted attempts by the
labour party, who on
this issue are supported
by the vast majority of
the British Public, to
force it to publish an
internal assessment of
the risks posed by the
controversial NHS
reforms, reforms that
rather like the recent
welfare reforms the
government is hell bent
on imposing on an
unwilling public.
Concerning the failure
to force the government
to publish the NHS risk
register you have to ask
yourself the question:
If there is nothing to
hide than why not
publish it?
What an absolute
scandal. Yet another
blow to democracy.
There are no ifs buts
or ands. It matters not
what the government want
regarding NHS reforms or
anything else, in a
democracy it is what the
people want. An
estimated Eighthly
five percent of the
British public are
against the
government’s NHS
reforms. The majority.
At the end of the day
this is the one and only
criterion that counts.
If your MP and the
government do not take
heed of the majority of
people we are not a
democracy. Each and
every MP from Cameron
down to the back
bencher’s duty is to
represent the people, if
he or she is not doing
so they are failing in
their duty to you and to
the British people and
have no right to
represent you.
I along with many
others have written
letter after letter,
e-mail after e-mail
until my arms and back
have ached and I am
exhausted. I have
written protesting the
NHS reforms as I have
written to oppose the
welfare reforms and
nothing changes as they
go about their agendas
in total disregard for
what the people want.
The whole thing is a
mockery of democracy and
social justice. This
point is even more valid
as the coalition
government do not have a
mandate, they were never
elected to represent us
and hopefully never ever
will be again, at least
for a dammed long time.
I rather doubt that
either the Tory’s or the
lib deems will be
elected next time round,
I doubt the Lib/Dems
will be elected as an
overall majority for
decades.
The result of
privatising the NHS will
be catastrophic for most
of us except for the
government and other
members of the greedy
one percent who consider
themselves better than
the rest of us, worthy
of more money, better
housing, education and
health care, these
parasites who prey off
the rest of us will no
doubt have their medical
needs catered for with
Bupa or other private
health care. The rest of
us are not as fortunate:
Shadow
health
secretary
Andy
Burnham
claimed
regional
and
local
risk
registers,
which
have
been
published,
were
"appalling
and
shocking".
Some
of
the
regional
risk
registers
"predict
poorer
treatment
for
cancer
patients",
he
said.
The NHS Lincolnshire report identified a risk to "the continuation of the cancer service improvement, cancer network and the achievement of cancer waiting time target". The risk was rated 16, which meant it was "extreme, likely to happen with major consequences".
Read More
google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/
The NHS is just fine
as it is, there are the
odd exceptions but over
all it is an excellent
system of health care
free to everyone. No one
wishes to have the
private sector take over
the administration of
the health service or
the care of patients. At
least the vast majority
of us who do not earn or
have huge amounts of
wealth at our disposal.
Again the government are
running roughshod over
the wishes of the vast
majority.
Those of us who are
sick and disabled, which
could be anyone at any
time, depend on the NHS
and on welfare benefits
in order to have some
semblance of a life. The
detrimental reforms to
both are a disaster for
everyone, but the
combination of the two
for people who are
chronically ill and
disabled cannot be over
estimated.
We must continue the
pressure despite
feelings of hopelessness
.
Continue writing,
remind MPs that this is
a democracy and they
should reflect the
wishes of the people,
not some private agenda
that will benefit no one
save the privileged few.
The government is
supposedly elected by
the people, to work for
the benefit of the
people. If they do not
drop the NHS reform
bill, officially called
the Health and Social
Care Bill the government
are deliberately
ignoring the will of the
people which is an
outrageous and blatant
violation of democracy.
Never give up, we still
have hope:
Actions to Take
Keep an eye on 38
degrees to see what new
campaigns they have
organised in opposition
to the NHS and Welfare
reforms.
www.38degrees.org.uk/
Continue lobbying MPs
Remind them that this is
a democracy and they
should therefore comply
with the will of the
people
www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/
Petition
Drop the
Bill
epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/22670
More information
http://eoin-clarke.blogspot.com/2012/02/31-million-voters-want-nhs-risk.html
.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/feb/21/doctor-nhs-reforms-disciplinary-action?newsfeed=true
February24th
I
know some of you may
well be fed up with all
the political themed
entries, though if you
are a sufferer of a
mental health problem or
any other condition you
will at some point need
the NHS and may need
some kind of benefit in
order for you to simply
eat. And sadly that is
about all you may hope
to do if the welfare
reform bill is passed.
With the reduction in
income for every
disabled or sick person
including whole scale
looses of entitlement to
benefit you may find
yourself struggling even
more to pay those
extortionate prices in
the shops and for your
gas and electricity,
your rent... well just
about anything and
everything. Whether sick
and disabled now, either
mentally or physically
one day the vast
majority will need the
services of the NHS . So
this does concern you.
I am though on the
verge of signing up for
a blog which will focus
on human and animal
rights and I will than
direct my comments there
with just a link to the
new blog as new entries
are posted. After which
I hope to return to the
usual type of blogging
here.
Even if something
does not concern you
directly does not mean
it is not your problem
and that you should not
do what you can to stop
whatever injustice that
it is. And sadly the
things that one day we
think are not your
problem can so easily
without you realising
become so.
Such as those nasty
exploitative work
experiences schemes
commonly called workfare
as mentioned in an
earlier entry.
Which were once targeted
to the young and which
will eventually be
targeted towards the
sick and disabled
Please read entry in the
Diary of a Benefit
Scrounger: They don't
like it up 'em
diaryofabenefitscrounger.blogspot.com/2012/02/they-dont-like-it-up-em.html
Be
sure to click the link
to the Daily Mail
article written by
Duncan Smith
Why not include the link
directly here you may
ask
The answer is that I
would like you to read
the blog entry, Sue
Marsh the author of the
blog is an excellent
writer and will provide
you with a more
informative commentary
with a little satire
The Daily Mail article
concerns comments by
Duncan Smith criticising
the recent attacks on
the government's so
called work experience
schemes labelling them
exploitative slavery
In the article Duncan
smith says he is
"enormously pound"
of the government's work
experience schemes.
Umm I expect the
plantation owners in the
seventeenth century
looked out over their
vast plantations and
felt enormously proud to
be able to reap huge
profits from the sweat
of another man's labour,
enforced labour,
slavery. No not the same
thing maybe but the
principle is the same is
it not, enforced labour
is enforced labour
regardless of the method
of implementation. Tesco
and the rest are having
work carried out on
their behalf by people
who receive no
remuneration for their
efforts. The piffling so
called payment the
person receives in the
form of his or her
benefit to which he is
entitled is not paid for
by Tesco or the other
retailers in the scheme
but by you the tax
payer. Tesco are having
free work to help them
make millions each year
paid for by those of us
who pay tax. Usually the
hard working, working
and middle classes not
the super rich who are
having their taxes
written off.
Duncan Smith claims the
work is voluntary
It is up to young people
to decide, voluntarily,
whether they wish to
take part in the scheme,
and they can pull out of
their placement during
the first week without
sanction.
Taking part in this
scheme is not
optional, not voluntary.
On the whims of your Job
Centre Plus advisor you
may have to take part in
the work experience
programme and if you
refuse to comply you
will loose at least 13
weeks and and
potentially 26 weeks of
your benefit. This could
be extended to up to
three years under the
welfare Reforms bill.
Moreover you do not
choose your placement .
Despite propaganda to
the contrary
highlighting one or two
rarities as you will
read in the article,
most of the placements
involve work that
requires no training or
minimal trainings such
as stacking shelves and
washing floors and such
like which require
little other than basic
instruction, certainly
not thirteen weeks and
most definably not six
months or two years!!
Even if this is so and
it was voluntary that
still leaves young
people who are receiving
only £53 per week JSA
working along side other
employees doing the same
jobs for thirty hours
per week, and the time
range for this is
between 9am and 10pm
when surely an
unsociable hour rate of
pay would than be
applied in normal
circumstances for the
stint until 10am. This
works out at about £1.70
per hour. Would if
Duncan Smith would like
to work for that. These
placements can last for
8 weeks to two years in
some cases.
The Work Programme
itself involves
placements that can last
up to six months
and job seekers can be
assigned to the
programme for two years.
Read more
.latentexistence.me.uk/who-benefits-from-the-work-programme
Later in the article IDS
says
This is why the scheme
has been so successful.
The fact is that 13
weeks after starting
their placements, around
50 per cent of those
taking part have either
taken up permanent posts
or have stopped claiming
benefit
Yes they have stopped
claiming benefits
alright, who would want
to go through that again
and although I do not
know the facts I imagine
these schemes are not
one off and if you were
not offered employment
at the end of the
placement you would
likely find yourself on
another scheme at some
point. Besides if there
is a job available
packing shelves or
whatever than Tesco and
the others involved
should advertise the job
and employ someone in
the usual way, with the
usual rate of pay for
the job. What happens is
that when the term of
one placement ends and
the person is not
offered a job another
work experience
placement takes his or
her place. Wow! all that
free work, these
retailers ,it seems
mostly retailers, are
really on to a good
thing and unlike the
plantation owners of old
who had to provide a
place to live, cloths
and food, albeit in
meagre rations, its all
free. Absolutely free.
In this article Duncan
Smith picks the
successes which are are
in reality few
Take, for example,
20-year-old Samantha
Davies, from Neath,
South Wales, who took a
Work Experience
placement at a local
nursery. She impressed
them so much that she
was offered a job, and
now she has signed off
Jobseeker’s Allowance.
Now take for example
Here is a less
favourable case and one
which is the more likely
outcome:
I went to [her] leaving
do … We were all so
sorry to see her go. She
was an older lady and
was one of the most
hard-working and
genuinely helpful admin
staff we’d ever had.
Worked her hours plus
more and nothing was
ever too much trouble
for her. We honestly
didn’t know why she was
leaving after only six
months. She’d worked a
minimum of 37 hours per
week (often more) and
been the backbone of
service delivery. The
basic starting wage for
that level is around
£17,000 but for the work
she was doing I would
have expected her to be
started at a few
thousand more. Yet all
she was getting was JSA
and the fares for her
lengthy bus journeys,
while people doing
identical work were
getting a salary, paid
leave and pension
contributions. We were
horrified.
Wrongly, we assumed
this woman would be
hired back as proper
staff within days. The
role was needed, she’d
proven herself to be a
fantastic worker, was
well regarded and knew
the systems. But no, the
post was suddenly deemed
no longer required and
this lady never came
back to us. She did
exactly the same job as
paid staff, yet didn’t
get the same salary.
This is illegal if the
reason is age or race,
but perfectly acceptable
if someone has claimed a
state benefit. It’s
exploitation and it’s
repellent. [Quote
taken from Coporate
Watch]
Segment from Latent
Existence blog entry:
Who Benefits From the
Work Programme
latentexistence.me.uk/who-benefits-from-the-work-programme/
Also other examples
IDS Goes on to praise
the efforts of these
profiteering business as
though they are serving
some great humanitarian
cause.
The firms who have
offered work experience
to young people on this
scheme have been
absolutely brilliant
and, most importantly,
they are making a
difference in terms of
helping the young
unemployed get into
work.
If these firms really
wanted to help young
unemployed people they
would offer them a job.
If there is work for a
workfare placement than
there is a job, a paid
job. So interview the
applicant and if
suitable give him or her
a job, it is as simple
as that.
Duncan Smith claims that
:The
thinking behind the
initiative is the
recognition that when
considering whether to
take a young person on,
employers will highly
value any relevant work
experience
The key to the above
nonsense is relevant.
Work experience filling
shelves will only give
you experience to fill
shelves. So offering
such as a means of work
experience to give an
employed person a means
of demonstrating to an
employer that he has
experience will hardly
convince an employer
that the applicant has
experience in any thing
other than shelf
filling, not much use if
you are considering a
career as an
electrician, a white
collar worker, a
mechanic, gardener,
whatever, anything other
than in retail.
Duncan Smith boosts of
the 300 placements given
a permanent job with
Tesco's out of 1,400 as
some sort of a
achievement. What about
all the free labour from
the remaining 1100 who
will be replaced by
another workfare
applicant while they
themselves will I assume
go to another placement
at some point. Yes I am
going to continue to
call this scheme
workfare after the
American equivalent
which Duncan Smith
protests is not the
same. Sounds the same to
me enforced labour at
some point in their term
of unemployment. Besides
300 out of 14000, not
what I would call an
achievement.
In an even more lame
attempt at justifying
this form of
exploitation Duncan
Smith says:
Sadly, so much of this
criticism, I fear, is
intellectual snobbery.
The implicit message
behind these
ill-considered attacks
is that jobs in retail,
such as those with
supermarkets or on the
High Street, are not
real jobs that
worthwhile people do.
How insulting and
demeaning of the many
thousands of people who
already work in such
jobs up and down the
country
What is insulting Mr
Duncan Smith is your
condescending attitude,
do you seriously think
that anyone is going to
believe that
intellectual snobbery is
the reason behind the
protests.
In plain English:
The opposition to
workfare programmes is
based upon the fact that
people are being
forced into labour,
and moreover for less
than the basic minimum
wage. In fact no wage
from the employer. If
the entire work
experience programmes
where all entirely
voluntary and paid the
same pay for the job by
the employer that other
workers receive for
doing the same work than
I would imagine that it
is very unlikely anyone
that would object.
Really Mr Duncan Smith,
how insulting of you! Do
you think we are all
stupid and will actually
fall for this rhetoric
which serves as one of
your usual distractions.
Intellectual snobbery!
Really!
Yes as Duncan Smith goes
on to point out, maybe
Tesco's former Chief
executive began life
scrubbing floors at
Tesco, but he was not
forced to so for no pay
.
What is even more
insulting is that Duncan
Smith considers that
we
are caught in a battle
between those who think
young people should work
only if they are able to
secure their dream job
and people like himself
who think that all jobs
are of value, and instil
a sense of purpose. Yes
to employers all jobs
are of value but sadly
these days with low
wages and long
uncompromising hours
there often appears
little value to the
lives of workers who
have to endure these
circumstance in order to
pay huge mortgages or
rents and somehow try to
feed their families
against the onslaught of
escalating bills for
food and heating , which
sadly is these days the
only purpose for many in
going to work. As for
waiting to secure their
dream job, seriously the
delusion regarding such
high expectations
presents as he well
knows in a minuscule
percentage of the
population.
The ultimate insult or
attempt to malign the
legitimacy of the
opposition to workfare
is the idiotic
suggestion that there
are those who believe
that being a celebrity
and appearing on X
factor are the only
worthwhile pursuits of
life. Yes again there
are always the dreamers,
there always has been,
but to suggest such
ideas exist to a great
extent in the general
population is as deluded
a notion as the idea
itself.
I really have to quote
the final sentence
The belief that you can
just sit at home or wait
to become a TV star and
that work simply lands
in your lap, in turn,
feeds the pernicious
idea that success is not
related to effort and
work.
Well not for most of the
conservative MPs, most
of whom were born with a
silver spoon in their
mouths.
Read the entire article
from the Daily Mail. I
hate giving links to
negative articles or
ridiculous propaganda
but sadly my own keen
sense of ethics and copy
write accreditation
requires I do so.
dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2104022/The-delusions-X-Factor-sneering-job-snobs-betray-young.html
Are you enraged . Yep I
sure am.
Please visit:
.boycottworkfare.org/
Lots of action for you
to take on March 3rd
also other actions
.boycottworkfare.org/?page_id=82
Remember it is not only
young people, some kind
of work experience
programme is planned for
those allocated to ESA
Work Related Activity
Group WRAGS
Incidentally I have not
heard from Tesco, my
husband and I sent them
a letter retuning our
coupons and points card
cut into four stating
that until they stop the
workfare programme we
would not set foot in
the door. Still have
received no reply.
We have also boycotted
Holland and Barrett,
which is not easy as I
am a vegan and my
husband and son are
vegetarians which means
for some of our
requirements we will
need to go on
forty mile trip and shop
less often.
If we can stop retailers
and others doing
this the government will
have no other choice
than to provide a more
fair scheme or simply
provide real Job
training or jobs for
that matter.
February 25th
Great news as Tesco and
other retailers change
their stance on Workfare
placements.
Tesco said that although
it was sticking with the
coalition's work
experience scheme, it
would now offer
jobseekers a choice of
remaining on benefits or
taking up paid work with
a guarantee of a staff
job at the end of the
four-week placement if
the trial was
successful.
Meanwhile, Argos and
Superdrug said they were
suspending their
involvement pending
talks with ministers
from the Department for
Work and Pensions to
ensure that the scheme,
which has been
personally championed by
senior coalition
figures, is voluntary
and that jobseekers
would no longer fear
having their benefits
removed if they pulled
out of placements after
the first week.
Please read the complete
article:
Work experience
scheme in disarray as
Tesco and other
retailers change tack
Supermarket offers paid
work to unemployed
people on coalition
scheme, while Argos and
Superdrug suspend
involvement
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/feb/21/back-work-scheme-disarray-tesco
At last we can feel as
though we are making a
difference and bringing
about a positive change
to one of the many grave
social injustices
perpetrated against the
people of the UK .
Despite the campaigning
by Duncan Smith,
Greyling and Clegg to
undermine the campaign
these latest
developments are
encouraging and show the
government they cannot
do exactly what they
want.
It just shows what can
happen if people get
together to protest
against social in
justice.
Unfortunately Holland
and Barrett remain
stubborn and at the time
of writing continue with
the Workfare scheme.
Today I have written to
them expressing my
concern regarding their
unethical behaviour in
continuing with a scheme
that is nothing short of
enforced labour,
slavery. I have reminded
them that as a retailer
of vegan, vegetarian and
ethical products many of
their customers are
likely to be opposed to
this exploitation. I for
one am prepared to go to
an independent health
food store involving a
eighty mile round trip
rather than set foot in
their shop.
Even if you are not a
Vegan, Vegetarian or a
purchaser of
environmentally friendly
products this is an
ethical issue for
everyone and anyone who
has a sense of social
justice . The more
people who write the
more chance we have that
they will drop the
workfare Programme. We
have had success with
Tesco and others, so we
should not be
discouraged.
So why not write them a
letter:
Samuel Ryder House
Barling Way
Eliot Park
Nuneaton
Warwickshire
CV10 7RH
Or e-mail
You could you either
e-mail customerservices@hollandandbarrett.com.
Or
recruitment@hollandandbarrett.com.
http://www.hollandandbarrett.com/pages/contactus.asp?linkpos=row1
More Action
Below are more companies
that continue to be
involved in the workfare
slave-labour scheme.
Below is a convenient
and quick way to Tweet
them
These companies use
Workfare – help us tell
them to stop using it
by Sunny Hundal
Why are they not on the
list? Tweet at them to
ask them!
Read More and Take
action
http://liberalconspiracy.org/2012/02/24/these-companies-use-workfare-tell-them-to-stop-it/
February 26th
Please Note:
Somehow this month in a
state of confusion all
the fonts became green
and it was rather
difficult to
differentiate
quotations. My apologies
for any confusion, I did
not discover this until
late in the month. I
have gone through the
entire page to rectify
the problem but there
still may be quotations
not easily identifiable.
No excuses, but please
do not forget I suffer
with a number of
debilitating medical
conditions and from time
to time get things
rather muddled and it
can take a long while to
notice, let alone sort
it out.
I am now so exhausted.
Please in future if
anyone notices any
errors kindly take the
time to let me know.
Thank you
February27th
Justice will not be
served until those who
are unaffected are as
outraged as those who
are.
Benjamin Franklin
There is a day of
protest on Saturday
March 3rd against the
government's workfare
scheme. More information
from Boycott Workfare:
Boycott Workfare is a
UK-wide campaign to end
forced unpaid work for
people who receive
welfare. Workfare
profits the rich by
providing free labour,
whilst threatening the
poor by taking away
welfare rights if people
refuse to work without a
living wage. We are a
grassroots campaign,
formed in 2010 by people
with experience of
workfare and those
concerned about its
impact. We expose and
take action against
companies and
organisations profiting
from workfare; encourage
organisations to pledge
to boycott it; and
actively inform people
of their rights.
boycottworkfare.org/?p=359
Don't forget letter
writing/email. Letters
if you can as they are
not as easy to ignore.
Here are the postal
contact details of some
of the retailers and
others mentioned in the
above webpage who are
involved in workfare.
For e-mail addresses
scroll down or click
E-mail Addresses
Postal Addresses
Asda :